It is the position of the Weed Science
Society of America (WSSA) to promote the development and implementation
of biological control methods as a component of weed management strategies.
Weeds are estimated to cause more than
$40 billion in annual global losses through degraded agricultural and silvicultural
productivity, reduced access to land and water, impaired esthetics, and
disruption of human activities and well-being. Manual removal, mechanical
cultivation, cultural practices, or chemical herbicides can control weeds.
However, use of physical and/or chemical methods of weed control alone
is not feasible, desirable, or sufficient in every situation.
Biological control of weeds is broadly
defined as the use of an agent, a complex of agents, or biological processes
to bring about weed suppression. All forms of macrobial and microbial
organisms are considered as biological control agents. Examples of
biological control agents include, but are not limited to: arthropods
(insects and mites), plant pathogens (fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes),
fish, birds, and other animals. Biologically based weed management
is a much broader category of approaches that may include gene modification,
genetic processes, and gene products. Human activities intended to
remove weeds directly or indirectly, such as hand-weeding and burning,
deliberate uses of plant competition, allelopathy, and cultural and soil
management practices that alter the biotic balance of soil are considered
important adjuncts to biological control in integrated weed management
systems.
Biological control has been used successfully
as a practical and economically affordable weed control method in many
situations. While there has been an increase in interest in biological
control over the past 20 years, earlier instances of its use date back
to 200 years. Classical biological control, which is biological control
of non-native invasive weeds with natural enemies originating from the
native range of the weed, has proven a viable strategy for managing weeds
in areas subjected to low-intensity management, such as rangelands, forests,
preserved natural areas, and some waterways. The use of an inundative
method, also called the bioherbicide strategy, where an organism is applied
to achieve rapid reduction in weed populations, has also proven successful
in some instances. In the future, pathogens may also be used to introduce
or alter specific genes to control growth, flowering, seed set, and/or
competitiveness of weeds.
It is imperative the next generations of
weed scientists are trained in the principles and practices of biological
weed control. Weed science curricula must introduce students to the
major groups of biological control agents and research methods. Conservation
and integration of biological control agents must be taught as one of the
foundations of sustainable weed management.
It is the position of WSSA that biological
control agents and methods are developed as weed control options to maintain
sustainability in agriculture and for the protection of natural resources.
Biological weed control should be a component of integrated weed management
systems consisting of multiple biological control organisms and judicious
use of chemical, cultural, and physical methods. It is essential
to continue funding of research and development of biological weed control
as a management option, to foster a commitment from federal, state, private,
and public institutions to this option, and to increase emphasis on biological
weed management in weed science curricula. WSSA supports biological
control of weeds with research presentations on this method of weed control
at its annual meetings, a Biological Control of Weeds Committee to inform
and enable its membership to focus on issues related to the biological
control of weeds, and symposia and production of literature on the topic.